Tuesday, January 9, 2018

What are we marching for?



So, the first anniversary of the inauguration of #45 #notmypresident is coming up and I’m seeing calls for a redux of the 2017 post-inauguration Women’s March.  I was there, in Seattle – with 150,000 others.  It was an amazing thing, in Seattle and around the world.  It was the largest global protest in history as well as the largest protest march ever in Seattle and many other American cities.  Women were galvanized by the Access Hollywood tape to declare, among other things, that Trump was not fit to be president and that he clearly did not represent them.  Obviously, there were many other issues brought out by his campaign promises that were of concern: refugees and immigration, the environment, reproductive rights, etc.  But it was the women, and their outrage against this man’s constant demeaning of women throughout the campaign and throughout his life, that sparked that first march.  It was the women who stood up and said, “This is wrong and we will not stand for it.  You cannot continue to treat us this way.  We are listening and we are watching!”  

But for what is being dubbed as Women’s March 2.0, I can’t figure out what the real message is.  It seems to me that a planned and promoted march/rally ought to have a clear goal – to rally the masses to inspire them to work on some specific thing, to communicate some specific demand(s) to the leaders, or both.  There are certainly many issues we could rally around, but this being the anniversary of the inauguration, it seems most fitting that we should keep the heat on Trump and his Republican cronies.  But “Unity, Equity, and Justice”?  That’s awfully vague.  Here’s what the Seattle march Facebook page says, “To engage and empower all people to support women's rights, racial equity, human rights, civil rights, disability rights, LGBTQIA rights, workers’ rights, immigrant rights, reproductive rights, Indigenous people's rights and social and environmental justice.”  Um, okay, I’m all for that.  But that’s not a statement that moves people.  And there’s no clear action behind it – nothing about what we’re going to do and nothing about what we expect from government or corporate leaders.  And I don’t know if this is an issue across the country, but in Spokane the organizers are struggling because, as one organizer put it, “as an all-inclusive non-partisan non-profit, the Women's March was focused on educating people about legislation on issues like equity and human rights. It wasn't meant to be a political group singling out people or organizations.”  I don’t know where that ever came from but the first march, last year, was definitely meant to be political.  And here’s a statement from the Women’s March Alliance FAQ page about why we march: “Remind the existing government body that they report to the people and the people expect their civil liberties to be upheld. 

Really???  Remind them?  WTF!?!!  We have a man in the White House who has admitted to sexually assaulting women and backed a candidate who has been accused of sexually assaulting children; who has equated racist right-wing extremists and Nazis with those who oppose them; whose businesses directly benefit financially from his role as president; who believes that climate change is a hoax; who has made totally unfounded claims of voter fraud; who has no foreign policy except to fling tweets full of insults, threats, and bravado at leaders of other countries; who has appointed agency heads who want to dismantle the very agencies they are supposed to lead; who has appointed an attorney general who has taken regressive positions on civil rights, the death penalty, drug enforcement laws, and many other issues in our justice system; who continues to vilify Muslims and Latinos; who is suspected of colluding with Russia against his political opponent; who acts as commander-in-chief by tweeting that transgender individuals can no longer serve in the military – without consulting with military leaders; and whose fitness for the office is finally being questioned by mental health professionals.

Based on all of that, we ought to be taking that outrage from last year and demanding that our congressional representatives call him out on every one of those things, begin investigations into every accusation of sexual assault, investigate his ties with the neo-Nazi alt-right, denounce all of his ridiculous tweets, and take away that big button of his.  This man is not only unfit to run this country; he is dangerous to our national security, our environment, and our health.  We should be demanding nothing less than impeachment.

Women should be feeling even more outraged and motivated to make these demands in the wake of the recent #MeToo movement that is shining a bright light on the persistence of the patriarchy.  It’s not just about harassment in the workplace.  It is about men not taking women seriously, about men objectifying and sexualizing women.  It is about a deeply held belief that men have a right to women’s bodies and that women should be nice, sweet, quiet and do what they are told.  And are they really saying we can’t attach our signs to wooden sticks?  Give me a f'ing break!  A bunch of red neck white guys staged an armed protest and occupation of a federally owned facility with very few consequences! 

But, like Elizabeth Warren, we should persist.  We are far beyond “reminding”… It is time to demand.  And while our protests should be non-violent, they should certainly be loud enough to be heard in Washington, in state capitals all over the country, on Wall Street, and in Hollywood.  At this point, I don’t even know if I’m going to the rally/march.  I don’t know that I want to waste my time on something so pitifully inadequate.  Last year’s march was exciting, awe inspiring, and motivating.  With the way things are looking this year, I expect the results of the Women’s March of 2018 to be disappointing at best.

But, if I go, I’m carrying my sign on a stick!!

No comments:

Post a Comment